Do you use Torrent? Aur aapko yeh samjhaya hai ki kya Torrents Legal hai ya Illegal, aap sabhi shayad Torrents ko jarur kaam mein lete honge. United States. You can use these services to torrent safely and legally to stay out of the trouble. Before checking them out, in case, you are looking for some legal ways to download free games, software, apps, and movies, etc. Last year, when I was writing about the completely free and legal movie download websites, I came across Public Domain Torrents.
At that time, I was surprised to find a website which was completely legal. It hosts lots of Classic Movies and B-Movies which you can download for free. You can choose the category to narrow down your search or click on the top-seeded and newest added options. Many of the classic movies hosted here are difficult to find anywhere else. The movies on this free and legal torrents website are sorted in different categories like sci-fi, horror, comedy, film noir, etc.
Apart from movies, there is also a section for television as well. The overall collection has about hundreds of movies that you can enjoy safely and legally.
As per the current count, the website hosts more than legal torrents that you can use for downloading purposes. The website is pretty neatly designed and the search option works well. While searching for a torrent, you can choose the category—shows, Linux distro, movies, music, games, anime, books, apps, etc.
The Extra Stats section also features the top 10 most active torrents. Moreover, it also turns as a great source of legal torrents for safe downloading. It hosts video content which is divided into many categories like comedy, TV and movies, music videos, news, TED Talks, etc. You can visit the online website or access the torrent directory from the Vuze client itself. The overall interface is pretty simple and straightforward.
Bitlove is another great way to find legal torrents. The website has a large directory which has more than audio torrents and more than videos.
The directory is pretty neatly organized in the alphabetical orders. One of the best features of Bitlove is that you can sort the content on the basis of languages. This is an important feature as the website is a great source of audio and video podcasts. You can also use this legal torrenting website to share your own podcast feed. The website also ensures data integrity using SHA1 hashes.
If you love distro ho pping, Linux Tracker is the go-to website for you. Solely dedicated to Linux distros and their legal torrenting, this website has been tracking Linux torrents from the past 12 years.
The website homepage has different Linux torrents sorted according to date, seeders, leechers, etc. In a glance, you can see the upload date, and size of the image.
You can use this website to download music torrents safely and legally. The content uploaded on this website is under Creative Commons license. You can also search for relevant tracks, communities, and playlists. Another great feature of Jamendo is its Radio feature that allows you to listen to free and legal music from various genres. Vodo is a great option for indie lovers who wish to visit a legal torrent website, watch free movies, and download their torrents if they wish.
The site also allows you to support your favorite artists with the help of donations. The interface of the website is very simple, and the featured content is listed on the website homepage. You can search the movies and use the sorting options to find the required content easily. GGEplayer Aritaleres. Nov 19, at am. Mar 12, at pm.
Apr 9, at am. Apr 9, at pm. May 9, at am. Sergio Fonseca. Dec 27, at pm. Dec 31, at pm. Jan 31, at am. Mar 31, at pm. Apr 1, at pm. Austin Nuker. Jan 6, at pm. The Raleigh Boyz control craigslist and the staff love them.
Joe Roberts. Jan 14, at am. What about pay sites like USeNext and Graboid? Are they safer than sites like kickass? They cost money.. Sara Conner. Jan 16, at pm. Why pay for a private VPN when you can use onion routing? Miguel Is A Noob. Feb 20, at pm. John Anthony. Jan 21, at pm. Isaac Lloyd Gomez Humarang. Feb 1, at am. Feb 2, at am. Feb 6, at pm. Of course not dipshit. Feb 10, at pm. Feb 12, at pm. Apr 8, at pm. Feb 17, at pm.
Feb 28, at pm. Mar 3, at pm. Mar 6, at am. What about if you use a blocker such as PeerBlock, do these programs help? Mar 6, at pm. Mar 19, at pm. Mar 20, at am. Is it anything like this? Mar 25, at pm. Apr 3, at pm. Technically, it is. Link TheProgrammer. Apr 11, at pm. Apr 17, at pm. Apr 21, at pm. Apr 23, at pm. Don't need to know. Is downloading a torrent of Windows 7 illegal or legal. This is technically illegal.
So what happen if I get caught? Apr 24, at am. Apr 29, at am. Apr 29, at pm. May 26, at am. Hi, my quistion is to download movies in holland is being illegal from how big is the chance to get caught for being downloading movies and have it effect on wifi if wifi not being protected so everyone can connect the network and download it.
May 26, at pm. May 27, at am. May 30, at am. May 30, at pm. Jun 1, at pm. Jun 2, at pm. Jun 3, at pm. That would be like saying that you are responsible for a car crash when your car was stolen just because you owned it, this shit wont ever make it through the system based on expense and the fact that they cant pick and choose who they want the prosecute they cant ignore part of the list and send different parts of it to gaol, that would be discrimination If you are concerned with the ethics behind it then consider that you basically still pay the full amount to see the movie at the cinemas.
If your still concerned then use your work internet or the free wifi at mcdonalds haha. Jun 14, at pm. Jun 16, at pm. Jun 17, at am. As for software, anything with a GNU license can be distributed freely. Jun 15, at pm.
Jun 17, at pm. Jun 25, at am. So, if you are in Germany, watch out! Jun 25, at pm. Jan 17, at am. Hi there; I learn some tricks from experts for the ppz that have problems with downloading from torrents. Juan cena. Feb 3, at am. Feb 21, at pm. Could someone elaborate on Advanced Onion Router, please? Feb 22, at pm. Mar 5, at pm. Mar 30, at am. May 22, at am. Jun 19, at pm. Nov 2, at am. Popular Posts Instagram Not Working? S 20 odd years later and it was revealed that the U. This is typical of one country the U.
Still what remains is the differences in perspective towards torrenting and what you and I may see as Right or Wrong, as different or not as that may be.
And everybody knows that. To put it frankly, Duplicating copyright material is not illegal everywhere. Your legal perspective and probably more appropriately your moral perspective does not apply to me. The TV as it is a physical item, ones and zeros Binary Code are not physical. Both a TV and a TV show are property: the former is physical property, the latter is intellectual property.
A content owner is entitled to determine the pricing and distribution mechanisms for their content. You either pay the price or you do without. I think not this is an education process to get all thinking the same way and what a boring place it would become around the world. Intellectual property rights are not enacted into law everywhere.
Paragraph 3: Read my previous 2 comments thoroughly please. Paragraph 4: Your absolutely correct in that statement, it opens up a wide variety of options legal and illegal depending on where you live and your moral code. Paragraph 5: genuinely not sure what your trying to express here, but as far as pricing options are concerned you shop around, but I fear, where you live my choice may be viewed as illegal.
In conclusion, you are entirely correct, that torrenting of copyright material without the appropriate licencing in countries that have outlawed the practice is wrong and anything outside that is a matter of debate within the bounds of that countries borders, looking from a legislative point of view.
Moral Justice is too subjective considering the wide range of cultures around the world we need to look to a more objective way to resolve the matter, to level the field so to speak. Out of the ish nation states that currently exist, are party to the Berne Convention — including Australia, NZ and India.
The same applies when region codes and regional formats applied i. Just an example of the differences in law. I must admit at first I all I saw was another U. While non-member states are obviously not subject to the terms set out in the Convention, they likely do have their own laws relating to copyright. For Leo. Just wanted to say thanks firstly, for the newsletter and secondly for your patience, tolerance and for the band width on this issue.
S thanks for fixing that typo for me too! Ray Smith A couple of genuine questions here if I may, 1. China was not a signatory to the patent or copyrights agreements for many years as I recall and we could see direct copies of well known brands coming out of china but under different trade names on our shelves. Are they now part of the International agreement on these issues? Where I reside we were always permitted to make copies of our legally obtained media however a couple of international companies tried to have a go at the little man using our judicial system and came of second best.
Are US Citizens now allowed to make copies of their own media? Answered by Mark! So once again thankyou to everyone for the interesting and enlightening debate. There also seems to be a reasonable level of ignorance regarding some aspects of this issue and that in itself can add a level of context and perspective to the issue.
The making available of copyrighted music files on peer-to-peer systems is illegal in Canada. Uploading a copyright file and sharing it is illegal. There is no doubt. If it were possible, is just downloading free available yet copyright material illegal? I suspect that this is the reason that virtually all court cases are aimed at those uploading. Outside that all the charges and fines apply. To imply that your law US law, presumably takes precedence over all other law is not only arrogant but it is factually wrong!
Unless of course that person, involved in that activity, is subject to those laws outlawing that specific activity. I am required to submit to my national laws and they take precedence. You are obviously a strong supporter of your nations laws regarding this and I do genuinely respect that, I also support and believe in my nations legal system in as far as what I am permitted to or not to do otherwise anarchy would reign and that system greatly differs from yours. In Nazi Germany, it was strictly illegal to hide Jews from being picked up for instance.
They still have it. What you simply have done, is taken away the opportunity of the owner to frustrate you for not being able to see the movie, so that this frustration can be turned into a deal where you can relieve your frustration against paying the owner. Does that mean that I endorse illegal activity? But only because of the trouble you might get yourself in, not because it is morally wrong.
You follow the law for the same reason that you hand over your wallet to the guy pointing a gun at you. Because not handing over your wallet will hurt you probably more, not because you think it is morally right to hand over your wallet. But you should follow it simply because of the trouble you can get yourself in by not following it. So, do not copy copyrighted stuff. Strongly disagree, in fact. I consider that it is morally wrong to HARM others.
In fact, I think that frustrating others if at no cost, this frustration can be left, is actually harming others, and hence immoral. Nevertheless, that is the basis of intellectual property rights. They are fundamentally morally wrong in this respect.
Of course, there is the practical difficulty of your self-published author, but this is simply because your self-published author is counting on the fact of being able to frustrate so many people in not having his works, and nevertheless be successful, that he can bring frustration in the minds of other people, so that afterwards he can ask a ransom for it.
He created the frustration by making his work known to exist, and then asked a ransom from people for them to get a copy which cost him 0. There is a very simple solution to this: crowdfunding. When the author considers that the amassed funding is sufficient for him to create the work, then he can create it, and make it public.
He has been remunerated for the effort he has been delivering on the basis of what people were willing to offer him for him to do his creative work. Both people willing to pay for his creative act and him were happy in doing what they did. In other words, what the author has been paid for, was his creative act.
He accepted a pay for a service, in the same way as my plumber accepts a pay for the work I want him to do in my kitchen. When the act was over, people were even. It is one of the aspects that has made our species successful. Intellectual property rights are at the basis of artificial scarcity in order to be able to pump money that is, goods and services with REAL scarcity from others.
They make illegal one of the basic properties of our human species: imitating, learning from others, transmitting to others, and improving.
Imitating others is not theft: you do not harm them in any way. If you create something to show it to others to give them envy to LEARN from it that is, see it, read it, copy it, imitate it , then it is perfectly normal that others look at it, read it, copy it, imitate it.
You then being able to frustrate them from doing so legally, is inhuman and not morally right. If you want to be remunerated because you create something, you should negotiate your act of creation with those who would want you to create something. If I want my plumber to do some plumbing work in my house, I negotiate a price.
However, once his work is over, he has been remunerated and we are even. In the same way, anybody, any group of people can pay someone to do some creative work. As the further cost to copy that work is 0, it should be available to be copied as anybody likes. Of course, if nor the author, nor the crowdfunders, are willing to put it at disposition of others, they have that right. Do you think that Leo should have no protection for the content he creates?
Do you think that photographers should have no way of making money, except to crowdfund prior to taking each and every photograph? The photographer should be paid to take a picture. For the service delivered of taking a picture, with his art, knowledge and skill. Well, then I better shut down Ask Leo!. My entire business is built around owning the rights to my own intellectual property. People making a copy of something they have, to help out others, are not harming any body.
Even when individuals win, they are often landed with crippling legal costs, and when they lose, are often also ordered to pay all legal costs for the winning party. In the unlucky event you receive a subpoena for copyright offenses, the EEF offers some good advice plus resources, much of which may also be broadly useful outside the United States. To the best of our knowledge, no-one anywhere has been subject to a criminal prosecution just for file-sharing content for personal non-profit use.
But an increasing number of countries have enacted laws that, at least on paper, allow alarmingly severe criminal punishments to be leveled against ordinary torrenters. As already discussed, for example, there is no minimum level of copyright infringement in the UK before offenders can be sentenced to 10 years' imprisonment.
Such laws can be enforced at any time, and governments are not known for passing laws they never intend to use. The only provisos are that you use a VPN service which allows torrenting , and that you use a kill switch to prevent your real IP address from becoming accidentally exposed in the event of a VPN failure.
It really is as simple as that, and lame advice found elsewhere, such as avoiding recent DVD releases, is alarmingly dangerous. We recommend the following VPN services because they are secure, private, and allow torrenting on their servers. Private Internet Access - Unrivalled torrenting support, and a no-logs policy that's been proven in court Surfshark - An excellent budget VPN, with torrenting support and lots of features.
With both Usenet and cloud torrent services such as put. But it's important to remember that the Usenet or cloud torrent service does know your real IP address and probably also has your payment details. And services such as these can be hacked or legally forced to hand over your personal details. In , for example, Dutch Usenet providers Eweka and Usenette were ordered to hand over the personal details of two of their customers accused of uploading over 2, eBooks, while in Eweka again was forced to identify a former customer accused of uploading copyright-infringing material.
We, therefore, strongly recommend using a VPN with such services anyway, so why not just cut out the often quite pricey middle man? Ever-greater internet speeds have made streaming video content from websites or IPTV servers via Kodi and suchlike the go-to option for most casual video pirates in theory it is possible to stream music illegally, but the pervasive presence of legal YouTube music videos means this has never really got off the ground.
Streaming has the advantage that playback is pretty much instant, but it is usually possible to torrent much higher quality videos. And of course, streaming-only lets you watch video content, while you can torrent apps, games, lossless music files, audiobooks, eBooks, and more. And, as with Usenet and cloud torrenting services, the streaming provider can see your real IP address, which can potentially be logged and handed over to copyright holders.
This is also probably a good time to remind Popcorn Time users that although the app looks and behaves like a streaming service, it's really just a fancy BitTorrent client.
So please do use a VPN with it. Private trackers mean that your torrent downloads are shared among far fewer people than with public trackers. The chances that one of your peers is a copyright enforcer are much lower as a result. Copyright holders can hang out on torrent forums and blag invites to private torrent sites just like anyone else can. Fans of private trackers claim that content moderation means higher quality content. But honestly, even the most experienced torrenters have seen precious little evidence to support such a claim.
More persuasive is the argument that strictly enforced high seed ratios improve download speed performance. This might be true, but large torrents that are far off the trending list can be an albatross around your neck, as they make achieving the required seed ratio very hard.
Looking for something?
0コメント